Grow the program. Not the queue.
Compliance AI is the compliance system of intelligence: agents, the providers and tools they operate, human review gates, and a complete audit trail — one vertically integrated system running global KYC, KYB, KYT, and AML work. It runs Infinite’s own compliance program today, and a named analyst signs every decision.
Watch a case assemble itself. Then sign it.
- 01AssembleThe case builds itself (registry, ownership, screening, documents) before an analyst ever opens it.
- 02DecideA human signs every decision. The work left is judgment, not assembly: minutes of analyst time, not weeks of case-building.
- 03CompoundCleared once, cleared for the whole network. Every member this business meets starts pre-cleared.
- Rio Verde Foods S.A.KYB REVIEW · SÃO PAULO, BRASSEMBLED
- Harbor Lane LtdPERIODIC REVIEW · UKCLEAR
- Kestrel Systems GmbHKYB REVIEW · GERMANYIN REVIEW
Compliance AI is the compliance system of intelligence behind Infinite (infinite.net): domain-tuned agents, the providers and tools they operate, the context of the account graph, human review gates, and a complete audit trail — one system. It runs global KYC, KYB, KYT, and AML work, and a named analyst signs every decision.
- Built for BSA officers and compliance leaders who own the decision — and the exam that follows.
- Every step the AI takes is logged, attributable, and visible in the case file.
- It runs behind Hosted Flows onboarding and transaction review across the network.
- Available as a managed service, or under a program your own analysts operate.
One system, not a model bolted on.
Compliance has a math problem: review volume grows with the book, and review capacity grows with headcount. Most AI tooling answers it by layering agents over the systems you already run, inheriting that stack’s queue, gaps, and blind spots. Compliance AI ships every layer together — agents, tools, providers, context, gates, evidence — and every layer is accountable.
- KYB — business verification
- KYC — identity verification
- Document verification
- Beneficial ownership (UBO)
- Device intelligence
- Sanctions and watchlists
- Politically exposed persons
- Adverse media
- KYT — counterparty and payment
- Transaction monitoring for AML
- Continuous re-screening
- Periodic review
- Case assembly and RFIs
Domain-tuned agents
Agents scoped to the casework — onboarding review, screening disposition, transaction-monitoring triage — not a general assistant pointed at a queue.
The tools of the work
Agents operate the real tools: screening, document verification, device intelligence, ledger history, and the case file itself.
Providers as tools
Risk providers are instruments the agents operate, not vendors you procure — Sardine’s device intelligence and behavioral risk signals, CipherOwl’s onchain screening and monitoring, alongside registry, document, and ledger sources. Institutions running their own program can point Compliance AI at theirs. Announced partners.
The context of the network
Every case draws on the account graph — entities, payment history, prior reviews — so no review starts cold.
Human review gates
Every decision point routes to a named human. The gate is structural — it cannot be configured away.
The audit trail
Every step every agent takes is logged, attributable, and exportable — built for examiners.
The model is a component
Models improve and get replaced. The gates, the tools, the context, and the trail do not change when they do — your exam posture is never staked on a model version.
It runs Infinite’s compliance program today.
Not a pilot: onboarding reviews, transaction-monitoring dispositions, and case assembly across the network run on Compliance AI every day. It was built by people who built compliance and risk products at Coinbase, Sardine, and Socure, to run our own program rather than to sell into someone else’s — which is why the gates and the evidence sit where they do. This is how a case moves.
Work arrives
An onboarding application, a flagged transfer, or a periodic review opens a case — the same flows Infinite’s compliance program runs every day.
Agents work the case
They run screening, process documents, and pull ledger history, then assemble one documented file — every item cited to its source, every action logged.
A human reviews at the gate
A named analyst opens a complete case, verifies the evidence, and works the open questions the agents flagged — nothing is resolved silently.
The decision is signed
Approve, reject, or escalate — recorded with the analyst’s identity and reasoning. Reviews that ran ~30 days manually close in 1–2.
What the AI does not do.
It never approves, rejects, or off-boards a customer. Every case is decided by a named analyst.
It never files SARs or any other regulatory report. Analysts prepare and file, backed by the documented case.
Every step it takes is logged in the case file — visible to your team and to examiners, and attributable after the fact.
It operates inside written, human-approved policy. It does not set thresholds, change rules, or expand its own scope.
We run the program. Your analysts sign.
Run by the team that runs ours
Not a deployment into your queue. This is the same program that onboards and screens every business on the network, operated by the people who built it, with Compliance AI underneath. We built it to run our own compliance program before anyone asked to buy it — which is why the review gates and the evidence sit where they do.
The work compounds on the network
A counterparty cleared through the program is cleared for everyone on the network, not filed away for one customer. That is why first-time review takes 1–2 days instead of ~30, and why every company that connects makes the next review faster. A program run in isolation cannot do this at any price.
It connects to what you already run
Your case system, your screening, your core, your written policy — the system operates them as tools rather than replacing them. Bring your own providers where you have them, or use the ones already integrated here.
Your named humans keep the decision
The review gates and the audit trail are built in and cannot be configured away. Decisions stay with named analysts under your policy, and because the guarantee is a property of the system rather than of any model, it does not move when the models do.
Banks, fintechs, and platforms run their compliance programs here in different shapes — fully managed, co-operated, or self-operated on Compliance AI. Which one fits is a conversation, not a checkout.
Talk to us about a programAnswers before you ask
Who makes the final decision on a case?
A human analyst, every time. There is no configuration in which the AI approves, rejects, or closes a case on its own, and every decision is recorded with the analyst’s identity. That structure holds across every check the program runs — see Stablecoin Compliance for the check types and coverage behind each case.
What is a compliance system of intelligence?
It is everything around the agents, shipped as one system: domain-tuned agents, the providers and tools they operate — screening, documents, device intelligence, ledgers, case files — the context of the account graph, human review gates, and a complete audit trail. The agents do the casework; the system of intelligence is what makes that work reviewable, attributable, and defensible. It is built for the work end to end — not a general model bolted onto a workflow tool, and not point agents dropped into a queue.
What is a compliance AI harness?
The harness is the part of the system of intelligence that holds the agents accountable: the tools they are allowed to operate, the gates they must route through, and the record they leave behind. Infinite’s Compliance AI is a harness in that sense — the agents cannot act outside the tools, cannot pass a gate without a named human, and cannot take a step that is not logged.
Which compliance checks does the AI run?
Onboarding checks — business verification (KYB), identity verification (KYC), document verification, beneficial ownership, and device intelligence. Screening — sanctions and watchlists, politically exposed persons, adverse media, and KYT on counterparties and payments. Then ongoing transaction monitoring for AML, continuous re-screening, and periodic review. Every stage runs on fiat and stablecoin rails alike; coverage by market sits on the compliance use-case page.
Can Infinite run our compliance program as a managed service?
Yes — and the thing being offered is our own program, not a team stood up around your queue. Compliance AI runs Infinite’s onboarding reviews, transaction-monitoring dispositions, and case assembly every day, and work done on the network compounds: a counterparty cleared once is cleared for everyone on it, which is why first-time review takes 1–2 days instead of ~30. Named analysts decide every case, under your written policy. Shape, scope, and commercials are worked out per institution — talk to us.
Can we run Compliance AI over our own systems and providers?
That is the other shape it takes. Compliance AI is general — agents, tools, human review, evidence — and it operates the systems it is pointed at: your case system, your screening and identity providers, your ledgers, your policy. Compliance is the flow it runs in production today, and it applies anywhere backoffice work must be fast and defensible. It is built as a standalone layer; if you run your own program and want Compliance AI under it, talk to us.
What happens when the underlying AI models change?
Models get upgraded and replaced — that is normal, and the system is built so it changes nothing you have to defend. The review gates, the tools the agents operate, the network context, and the audit trail are properties of the system, not of any model, and each case records what ran against it. A file assembled a year ago reads the same way today, so nothing about your exam posture depends on which model version happened to be current.
Does Infinite use Compliance AI itself?
Yes — it runs Infinite’s own compliance program today: onboarding reviews, transaction-monitoring dispositions, and case assembly across the network. For businesses on the network its work comes with the platform rather than as a separate line item. Running it ourselves is why first-time counterparty review takes 1–2 days instead of ~30 — and we’ll walk through the underlying measurement with you in a demo.
What does an examiner see?
The complete case file: every document, every screening result with source and timestamp, every AI-prepared item labeled as such, and the named analyst behind each decision. The full trail is exportable — including the sanctions screening record behind each counterparty and payment.
- Compliance AIThe system of intelligence; a human decides
- Hosted FlowsCompliant onboarding, in your brand
- Stablecoin ComplianceKYB, KYC, KYT, and KYA to one global standard
Bring your program. Or let us run it.
Walk through a prepared case, the system of intelligence behind it, and the human-decision policy with our team — 30 minutes.